The role of advanced endoscopy in appendiceal polyp management and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Appendiceal orifice lesions are often managed operatively with limited or oncologic resections. The aim is to report the management of appendiceal orifice mucosal neoplasms using advanced endoscopic interventions. METHODS: Patients with appendiceal orifice mucosal neoplasms who underwent advanced endoscopic resections between 2011 and 2021 with either endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic mucosal dissection (ESD), hybrid ESD, or combined endoscopic laparoscopic surgery (CELS) were included from a prospectively collected dataset. Patient and lesion details and procedure outcomes are reported. RESULTS: Out of 1005 lesions resected with advanced endoscopic techniques, 41 patients (4%) underwent appendiceal orifice mucosal neoplasm resection, including 39% by hybrid ESD, 34% by ESD, 15% by EMR, and 12% by CELS. The median age was 65, and 54% were male. The median lesion size was 20 mm. The dissection was completed piecemeal in 49% of patients. Post-procedure, one patient had a complication within 30 days and was admitted with post-polypectomy abdominal pain treated with observation for 2 days with no intervention. Pathology revealed 49% sessile-serrated lesions, 24% tubular adenomas, and 15% tubulovillous adenomas. Patients were followed up for a median of 8 (0-48) months. One patient with a sessile-serrated lesion experienced a recurrence after EMR which was re-resected with EMR. CONCLUSION: Advanced endoscopic interventions for appendiceal orifice mucosal neoplasms can be performed with a low rate of complications and early recurrence. While conventionally lesions at the appendiceal orifice are often treated with surgical resection, advanced endoscopic interventions are an alternative approach with promising results which allow for cecal preservation.

Factors associated with stoma closure after cytoreductive surgery.

BACKGROUND: The rate of stoma closure after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) â€‹± â€‹hypethermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is reportedly low. This study aimed to assess predictors of stoma reversal. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent CRS with temporary ostomy at our center between 2009 and 2021, and compared reversed versus non-reversed patients. RESULTS: Out of 625 CRS, 72 (11.5%) patients were included (median age 62 years, 65% female, 75% with HIPEC): 53 (74%) achieved stoma closure. Reversed patients had less high grade tumors, more appendiceal mucinous neoplasms, less ovarian primaries, and more loop ileostomies. The most common reason for non-reversal was disease progression or death (14 cases, 74%). At multivariate analysis, low/intermediate grade tumor differentiation was associated with higher stoma closure rate. CONCLUSION: In our study, 74% of patients achieved stoma closure after CRS with temporary ostomy. The strongest predictor of stoma closure was a low/intermediate grade tumor.

Assessing prognostic factors of long-term survival after surgery for colorectal gastrointestinal stromal tumours.

AIM: Due to their rarity, the management of colorectal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (CR GISTs) is still under debate. The aim of this study was to assess prognostic factors. METHOD: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent surgery with curative intent for CR GIST at our centre from 2002 to 2019. Factors associated with overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analysed. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included [median age 63 years, 29 (52%) female, 30 (54%) Miettinen high-risk, 40 (71%) with rectal GIST]. Nineteen (34%) patients received perioperative (neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant) imatinib. All cases of colonic GIST had an R0 resection, compared with 28 (70%) of rectal GISTs. After a median follow-up of 97 months (interquartile range 48-155 months), 14 (25%) deaths and 14 (25%) recurrences occurred. In the high-risk cohort, factors associated with improved RFS were R0 resection (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.1-0.5, p = 0.002) and perioperative imatinib (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.42-0.97, p = 0.04). Patients who had received perioperative imatinib had longer RFS (60% vs. 11% at 5 years, p = 0.006) but not OS. In rectal GISTs, 5-year OS was 85% for R0 and 70% for R1 resections (p = 0.164) and 5-year RFS was 85% for R0 and 12% for R1 resection (p < 0.001). When stratifying patients by perioperative imatinib, there were no differences in OS or RFS in the R0 or R1 groups. CONCLUSION: Perioperative imatinib and R0 resection were associated with improved RFS in high-risk patients with CR GIST. In patients with rectal GIST, R1 resection was associated with worse RFS irrespective of perioperative imatinib treatment.

Idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of the mesenteric veins: A systematic review of surgical management.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of the mesenteric veins is an extremely rare non-thrombotic mesenteric veno-occlusive disease. The management of idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of the mesenteric veins is not well-established, and although surgery is the mainstay of treatment, the optimal operation remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to perform a systematic review to assess the various surgical procedures and associated outcomes for patients with idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of the mesenteric veins. METHODS: A systematic search for articles published from 1946 to April 2022 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cinahl, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases is reported. In addition, we report 4 cases of idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of the mesenteric veins managed at our institution until March 2023. RESULTS: A total of 53 studies and 88 patients with idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of the mesenteric veins were included. Most (82%) were male patients, with a mean age of 56.6 years old. The majority (99%) of patients required surgery. Most reports described the involvement of the rectum and sigmoid colon (81%). The most common surgical procedures were Hartmann's procedure (24%) and segmental colectomy (19%); completion proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was performed in 3 (3.4%) cases. In 6 (6.8%) cases, idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of the mesenteric veins was suspected preoperatively and managed with elective surgery. Four (4.5%) complications were reported. Nearly all (99%) patients achieved remission with surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: Idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of the mesenteric veins is a rare pathologic entity infrequently suspected preoperatively and typically diagnosed after surgical resection. Surgical resection with Hartmann's procedure or segmental colectomy was most commonly performed, with completion proctectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis reserved for cases of extensive rectal involvement. Surgical resection was safe and effective, with a low risk of complications and recurrence. Surgical decision-making should be based on the extent of the disease at the time of presentation.

The quality and content of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy information available to patients: An evaluation of North American hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy websites.

BACKGROUND: Patients commonly use the internet to obtain medical information. Patients in our outpatient setting frequently have incomplete or even incorrect information about hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy that they have found on the internet. We aimed to assess the quality and content of Web-based information on hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy using validated and novel scoring systems. METHODS: The keywords "HIPEC" and "hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy" were entered into the most commonly used internet search engines (Google, Bing, and Yahoo). The first 10 websites from each search were analyzed. Website quality was assessed using the validated Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria and DISCERN scoring systems. We created a novel hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy-specific score with surgeon experts in the field. RESULTS: Eighteen unique websites were identified. The majority (78%) were from academic institutions. The mean total DISCERN score for all websites was 41.8 ± 8.4 (maximum possible points = 75). The mean Journal of the American Medical Association and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy-specific scores were 1.72 ± 1.13 (maximum possible score = 4) and 11.5 ± 4.5 (maximum possible score = 31), respectively. The lowest Journal of the American Medical Association scores were in the category of authorship. In total, 78% of websites omitted author details; 83% and 78% included the temperature and duration of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, respectively. Only 39% of websites mentioned complications of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Web-based information on hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is of variable content and quality. None of the websites achieved maximum scores using any of the scoring tools. Less than half of the websites provided any information on possible complications of the procedure. These findings should be highlighted to patients using the internet to obtain information about hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Word of caution: Rectal cancer without response to neoadjuvant treatment - Do not wait for surgery.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that prolonging the interval to surgery in non-responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) could lead to worse oncologic outcomes. METHODS: Rectal adenocarcinoma patients with poor tumor response to nCRT (AJCC tumor regression grade 3) were selected. Oncologic outcomes were evaluated according to the time interval between completion of nCRT and surgery. RESULTS: Among 56 non-responders, 28 patients surgically treated ≥8 weeks after completion of nCRT had worse disease-free survival (31% vs. 49%, p â€‹= â€‹0.05) and worse overall survival (34% vs. 53%, p â€‹= â€‹0.02) compared to patients <8 weeks. Using the three different intervals (≥12 weeks, 6-12 weeks, and< 6 weeks), waiting longer was consistently associated with worse overall (23% vs. 48% vs. 63%, p â€‹= â€‹0.02) and worse cancer-specific survival (35% vs. 61% vs. 71%, p â€‹= â€‹0.04), respectively. CONCLUSION: For rectal cancer patients who are non-responders to nCRT, delay of surgery may lead to worse oncologic outcomes.

The use of laparoscopy for T4a and T4b colon cancer: are we playing with fire?

BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic approach for colon cancer has become widely accepted. However, its safety for T4 tumors, and particularly for T4b tumors when local invasion to adjacent structures occurs, remains controversial. This study aimed to compare short and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic vs. open resection for T4a and T4b colon cancers. METHODS: A prospectively maintained, single-institution database was queried to identify patients with pathological stage T4a and T4b colon adenocarcinomas electively operated on between 2000 and 2012. Patients were divided into two groups based on the use of laparoscopy. Patient characteristics, perioperative, and oncologic outcomes were compared. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients [41 laparoscopic (L), 78 open surgeries (O)] met the inclusion criteria. No difference was observed in age, gender, BMI, ASA, and procedure between groups. Tumors treated by L were smaller than O (p = 0.003). No difference was observed in morbidity, mortality, reoperation, or readmission between the groups. Length of hospital stay was shorter in L than O (6 vs. 9 days, p = 0.005). Conversion to open was necessary in 22% of all T4 tumors laparoscopic cases. However, when tumors were subdivided by pT4 classification, conversion was necessary for 4 of 34 (12%) pT4a patients vs. 5 of 7 (71%) pT4b patients (p = 0.003). In the pT4b cohort (n = 37), more tumors were treated by the open approach (30 vs. 7). For pT4b tumors, the R0 resection rate was 94% (86% in L vs. 97% in O, p = 0.249). The use of laparoscopy did not impact overall survival, disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, or tumor recurrence overall in all T4 or T4a and T4b tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery can be safely performed in pT4 tumors with similar oncologic outcomes as compared to open surgery. However, for pT4b tumors, the conversion rate is very high. The open approach may be preferable.

The Learning Curve for Advanced Endoscopy for Colorectal Lesions: A Surgeon's Experience at a High-Volume Center.

BACKGROUND: Advanced endoscopy can be used for the complete removal of large colorectal polyps. To date, few surgeons perform advanced endoscopy, and it is unknown how many procedures are needed to reach proficiency. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the learning curve for colorectal advanced endoscopy. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: We queried a prospectively maintained institutional database of advanced endoscopy performed by a high-volume colorectal surgeon between 2011 and 2018. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Advanced endoscopy characteristics were compared for 6 chronological intervals. Primary end points were the rates of complications and polyp recurrence. Secondary end point was the change in polyp removal rate (mm/h) over time. RESULTS: A total of 207 patients underwent advanced endoscopy for a single colorectal polyp. The median polyp size was 30 (4-70) mm, 61.5% were located in the right colon, and 8.8% were malignant. The mean procedure time was 77 (range, 16-320) minutes. Immediate colon resection occurred in 25 patients because of suspicion of cancer or concern for perforation and was excluded from the learning curve analysis. The remaining 182 advanced endoscopy procedures were divided into intervals of 30 procedures. The median removal rate was highest in the last interval and in the endoscopy suite. A removal rate of 30 mm/h was achieved after performing 100 cases. The complication rate (bleeding or return to operating room) was 12.1% and was similar across intervals. The readmission rate was 11.5%, and 6.6% of 6-month follow-up colonoscopies showed polyp recurrence at the resection site. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design and single surgeon. CONCLUSION: The learning curve for achieving proficiency with advanced endoscopy in the colon and rectum required a minimum of 100 cases with a low complication rate, low polyp recurrence rate, high en bloc resection rate, and a polyp removal rate of 30 mm/h. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C162 .LA CURVA DE APRENDIZAJE DE LA ENDOSCOPIA AVANZADA PARA LESIONES COLORRECTALES: LA EXPERIENCIA DE UN CIRUJANO EN UN CENTRO DE ALTO VOLUMENANTECEDENTES:La endoscopia avanzada se puede utilizar para la extirpación completa de pólipos colorrectales grandes. Hasta la fecha, pocos cirujanos realizan endoscopia avanzada y se desconoce cuántos procedimientos se necesitan para alcanzar la competencia.OBJETIVO:Determinar la curva de aprendizaje de la endoscopia colorrectal avanzada.DISEÑO:Retrospectivo.AJUSTE:Centro de referencia terciario.PACIENTES:Consultamos una base de datos institucional mantenida prospectivamente de endoscopia avanzada realizada por un cirujano colorrectal de alto volumen entre 2011 y 2018.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se compararon las características de la endoscopia avanzada en seis intervalos cronológicos. Los puntos finales primarios fueron las tasas de complicaciones y recurrencia de pólipos. El criterio de valoración secundario fue el cambio en la tasa de eliminación de pólipos (mm/h) a lo largo del tiempo.RESULTADOS:Un total de 207 pacientes se sometieron a una endoscopia avanzada por un solo pólipo colorrectal. La mediana del tamaño de los pólipos fue de 30 (4-70) mm, el 61,5% se ubicaron en el colon derecho y el 8,8% fueron malignos. El tiempo medio del procedimiento fue de 77 (rango: 16-320) minutos. La resección inmediata del colon ocurrió en 25 pacientes debido a la sospecha de cáncer o preocupación por la perforación y fueron excluidos del análisis de la curva de aprendizaje. Los restantes 182 procedimientos de endoscopia avanzada se dividieron en intervalos de 30 procedimientos. La mediana de la tasa de extirpación fue más alta en el último intervalo y en la sala de endoscopia. Se logró una tasa de extirpación de 30 mm/hr después de realizar 100 casos. La tasa de complicaciones (sangrado o retorno al quirófano) fue del 12,1% y fue similar en todos los intervalos. La tasa de reingreso fue del 11,5% y el 6,6% de las colonoscopias de seguimiento a los 6 meses mostraron recurrencia de pólipos en el sitio de la resección.LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo, cirujano único.CONCLUSIÓN:La curva de aprendizaje para lograr el dominio de la endoscopia avanzada en el colon y el recto requiere un mínimo de 100 casos con una baja tasa de complicaciones, baja tasa de recurrencia de pólipos, alta tasa de resección en bloque y una tasa de eliminación de pólipos de 30 mm/h. Consulte el Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C162 . (Traducción-Dr. Yesenia.Rojas-Khalil ).

Are large ileocecal valve lesions amenable with advanced endoscopic management to avoid bowel resection?

INTRODUCTION: Mucosal lesions located at the ileocecal valve may be challenging for endoscopic intervention because of angulated anatomy and a thinner wall with narrower lumen when compared to other locations of the bowel. This study aimed to evaluate the management and outcomes of ileocecal valve lesions treated endoscopically. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with mucosal neoplasms involving the ileocecal valve managed with advanced endoscopy at a quaternary care hospital between 2011 and 2021 were included from a prospectively collected database. Patient demographics, lesion characteristics, complications, and outcomes are reported. RESULTS: From 1005 lesions, 80 patients (8%) underwent resection for neoplasms involving ileocecal valve by ESD (n = 38), hybrid ESD (n = 38), EMR (n = 2), and CELS (n = 2). The median age of the study group was 63(37-84) years, and 50% of patients were female. The median lesion size was 34 mm (5-75). The mean procedure time was 66 ± 44 min(range:18-200). The dissection was completed as piecemeal in 41(51%) patients and 35(44%) had en-bloc dissection. Seven(8%) endoscopic interventions required conversion to laparoscopic surgery due to inability to lift the mucosa(n = 4) and perforation(n = 3). No immediate bleeding occurred in the study group. Five patients had late rectal bleeding and two were admitted with post-polypectomy pain within 30 days of intervention. Pathology revealed 4(5%) adenocarcinomas, 33(41.2%) tubular adenomas, 30(37.8%) tubulovillous adenomas, and 5(6.2%) sessile serrated adenomas. Sixty-seven (84.5%) patients completed at least one follow-up colonoscopy and were followed for a median of 11(0-64) months. Six (8.9%) patients had recurrence and were managed with subsequent endoscopic removal. CONCLUSION: Advanced endoscopy can be safely and effectively performed for the management of ileocecal valve polyps with low complication and acceptable recurrence rates. Advanced endoscopy promises an alternative approach to oncologic ileocecal resection while attaining organ preservation. Our study demonstrates the impact of advanced endoscopy for the treatment of mucosal neoplasms involving ileocecal valve.

Do surface morphology and pit pattern have a role in predicting cancer for colon polyps in North America?

BACKGROUND: The surface morphology of colorectal polyps is well correlated with submucosal invasion in Eastern Countries but not in North America. We aimed to investigate associations between the Paris classification, surface morphology, and Kudo pit pattern to submucosal invasion in advanced endoscopic resection techniques. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data of consecutive advanced endoscopic procedures conducted by a single surgeon between August 2017 and October 2018. The data included patients' demographics, the endoscopic finding of polyps (Paris, Kudo, and surface morphology), and pathology results. RESULTS: The study consisted of 138 lesions, and the mean age was 67 ± 10 years. The most common polyp locations were cecum (n = 41, 30%) followed by ascending colon (n = 28, 20%), and sigmoid colon (n = 18, 13%).The median polyp size was 30 mm (25-40). The en-bloc resection rate was 96%, and 11 (8%) polyps had adenocarcinoma with submucosal invasion. Nine patients (6.5%) had late bleeding, and 3 (2.2%) perforation occurred. Polyps with pit pattern of Kudo IV (n = 4, 36.4%) and Kudo V (n = 6, 54.5%) were associated with submucosal invasion. CONCLUSIONS: Surface morphology and pit pattern can predict submucosal invasion in the North American patient population. Polyp morphology may aid polyp selection for advanced endoscopic interventions.

Impact of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy on Postoperative Outcomes After Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Total neoadjuvant therapy is an alternative to neoadjuvant chemoradiation alone for rectal cancer and has the benefits of more completion of planned therapy, increased downstaging, earlier treatment of micrometastases, and assessment of chemosensitivity; however, it may increase surgical complications, especially with increased radiation-to-surgery interval. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine the impact of total neoadjuvant therapy on postoperative complications compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiation alone. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: Single tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: The patient included was a stage II/III rectal cancer patient who underwent total neoadjuvant therapy or long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgical resection from 2018-2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures included severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3). RESULTS: Of 181 patients, 86 (47.5%) underwent total neoadjuvant therapy and 95 (52.5%) underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation. There was no difference in severe postoperative complications or any complications. There was also no difference in the rate of complete total mesorectal excision or negative circumferential margin. Total neoadjuvant therapy had a mean operative time of 355.5 minutes and estimated blood loss of 263.6 mL compared with 326.7 minutes and 297.5 mL in the neoadjuvant chemoradiation group. Total neoadjuvant therapy patients had a lower mean lymph node yield than neoadjuvant chemoradiation patients. On multivariable analysis, total neoadjuvant therapy was associated with increased operative time (OR, 1.19; p < 0.001) and estimated blood loss (OR, 1.22; p < 0.001) and decreased lymph node yield (OR, 0.67; p < 0.001). There was no difference in severe complications or any complications. LIMITATIONS: Selection bias uncontrolled by modeling. CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in risk of postoperative complications between patients who received total neoadjuvant therapy vs neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Total neoadjuvant therapy patients had longer operations and greater estimated blood loss. This may be a reflection of increased operative difficulty because of increased radiation-to-surgery interval and/or the effects of chemotherapy; however, the absolute differences were small and, therefore, should be interpreted cautiously. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C44 . IMPACTO DE LA TERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE TOTAL EN LOS RESULTADOS POSOPERATORIOS DESPUS DE UNA PROCTECTOMA POR CNCER DE RECTO: ANTECEDENTES:La terapia neoadyuvante total es una alternativa a la quimiorradiación neoadyuvante sola para el cáncer de recto y tiene los beneficios de una mayor finalización de la terapia planificada, mayor reducción del estadiage, tratamiento más temprano de las micrometástasis y evaluación de la quimiosensibilidad; sin embargo, puede aumentar las complicaciones quirúrgicas, especialmente con un mayor intervalo entre la radiación y la cirugía.OBJETIVO:Determinar el impacto de la terapia neoadyuvante total sobre las complicaciones posoperatorias en comparación con la quimiorradiación neoadyuvante sola.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ENTORNO CLINICO:Centro único de referencia terciario.PACIENTES:Paciente con cáncer de recto en estadio II/III que se sometieron a terapia neoadyuvante total o quimiorradiación neoadyuvante de larga duración seguida de resección quirúrgica entre 2018 y 2020.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Complicaciones postoperatorias graves (grado de Clavien-Dindo ≥3).RESULTADOS:De 181 pacientes, 86 (47,5%) se sometieron a terapia neoadyuvante total y 95 (52,5%) se sometieron a quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante. No hubo diferencia en las complicaciones postoperatorias graves o cualquier otra complicación. Tampoco hubo diferencia en la tasa de escisión mesorrectal total completa o margen circunferencial negativo. La terapia neoadyuvante total tuvo un tiempo operatorio promedio de 355,5 minutos y una pérdida de sangre estimada de 263,6 ml en comparación con 326,7 minutos y 297,5 ml en el grupo de quimiorradiación neoadyuvante. Los pacientes con terapia neoadyuvante total tuvieron una media de ganglios linfáticos más bajo en comparación con los pacientes con quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante. En el análisis multivariable, la terapia neoadyuvante total se asoció con un mayor tiempo operatorio (OR = 1,19, p < 0,001) y pérdida de sangre estimada (OR = 1,22, p < 0,001) y menor cantidad los ganglios linfáticos (OR = 0,67, p < 0,001). No hubo diferencia en las complicaciones graves o cualquier complicación.LIMITACIONES:Sesgo de selección no controlado por modelado.CONCLUSIONES:No encontramos diferencias en el riesgo de complicaciones postoperatorias entre los pacientes que recibieron terapia neoadyuvante total versus quimiorradiación neoadyuvante. Los pacientes con terapia neoadyuvante total tuvieron operaciones más prolongadas y una mayor pérdida de sangre estimada. Esto puede ser un reflejo de una mayor dificultad quirúrgica como resultado de un mayor intervalo entre la radiación y la cirugía y/o los efectos de la quimioterapia; sin embargo, las diferencias absolutas fueron pequeñas y, por lo tanto, deben interpretarse con cautela. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C44 . (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

Leaks From the Tip of the J-pouch: Diagnosis, Management, and Long-term Pouch Survival.

BACKGROUND: The standard of care for surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis is restorative proctocolectomy with ileal J-pouch. Leaks from the tip of the J-pouch are a known complication, but there is a paucity of literature regarding this type of leak. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the diagnosis, management, and long-term clinical outcomes of leaks from the tip of the J-pouch at our institution. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of a prospectively maintained pouch registry. SETTING: This study was conducted at a quaternary IBD referral center. PATIENTS: Patients included those with ileal J-pouches diagnosed with leaks from the tip of the J-pouch. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main measures of outcomes were pouch salvage rate, type of salvage procedures, and long-term Kaplan-Meier pouch survival. RESULTS: We identified 74 patients with leaks from the tip of the J-pouch. Pain (68.9%) and pelvic abscess (40.9%) were the most common presentations, whereas 10.8% of patients presented with an acute abdomen. The leak was diagnosed by imaging and/or endoscopy in 74.3% of patients but only discovered during surgical exploration in 25.6% of patients. Some 63.5% of patients were diagnosed only after loop ileostomy closure, whereas 32.4% of patients were diagnosed before ileostomy closure. The most common methods used for diagnosis were pouchoscopy (31.1%) and gastrograffin enema (28.4%). A definitive nonoperative approach was attempted in 48.6% of patients but was successful in only 10.8% of patients overall. Surgical repair was attempted in 89.2% of patients, whereas 4.5% of patients had pouch excision. Salvage operations (n = 63) included sutured or stapled repair of the tip of the J (65%), pouch excision with neo-pouch (25.4%), and pouch disconnection, repair, and reanastomosis (9.5%). Ultimately' 10 patients (13.5%) required pouch excision, yielding an overall 5-year pouch survival rate of 86.3%. LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective review; referral bias may limit the generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: Leaks from the tip of the J-pouch have variable clinical presentations and require a high index of suspicion. Pouch salvage surgery is required in the majority of patients and is associated with a high pouch salvage rate. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C50 . FUGAS DEL EXTREMO DE LA BOLSA EN J DIAGNSTICO, MANEJO Y SUPERVIVENCIA A LARGO PLAZO DE LA BOLSA: ANTECEDENTES:El estándar de atención para el tratamiento quirúrgico de la colitis ulcerosa es la proctocolectomía restauradora con bolsa ileal en J. Las fugas del extremo de la bolsa en J son una complicación conocida, pero hay escasez de literatura sobre este tipo de fuga.OBJETIVO:Describir el diagnóstico, manejo y resultados clínicos a largo plazo de las fugas del extremo de la bolsa en J en nuestra institución.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo de registro de bolsa mantenido prospectivamente.ENTORNO CLINICO:Centro de referencia de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal cuaternaria.PACIENTES:Pacientes con bolsas ileales en J diagnosticadas con fugas del extremo de la J.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Tasa de rescate de la bolsa, tipo de procedimientos de rescate y supervivencia a largo plazo de la bolsa Kaplan-Meier.RESULTADOS:Identificamos 74 pacientes con fugas del extremo de la bolsa en J. El dolor (68,9%) y el absceso pélvico (40,9%) fueron las presentaciones más comunes, mientras que el 10,8% de los pacientes presentaron abdomen agudo. La fuga se diagnosticó por imagen y/o endoscopia en el 74,3%, pero solo se descubrió durante la exploración quirúrgica en el 25,6%. El 63,5% fueron diagnosticados solo después del cierre de la ileostomía en asa, mientras que el 32,4% lo fueron antes del cierre de la ileostomía. Los métodos más comunes utilizados para el diagnóstico fueron la endoscopia (31,1%) y el enema de gastrografín (28,4%). Se intentó un abordaje no quirúrgico definitivo en el 48,6%, pero tuvo éxito en solo el 10,8% de los pacientes en general. Se intentó la reparación quirúrgica en el 89,2% de los pacientes, mientras que en el 4,5% se realizó la escisión del reservorio. Las operaciones de rescate (n = 63) incluyeron la reparación con sutura o grapas del extremo de la J (65%), la escisión del reservorio con neo-reservorio (25,4%) y la desconexión, reparación y reanastomosis del reservorio (9,5%). Finalmente, 10 (13,5%) pacientes requirieron la escisión de la bolsa, lo que se asocio con una alta tasa de supervivencia general de la bolsa a los 5 años del 86,3%.LIMITACIONES:Revisión retrospectiva; el sesgo de referencia puede limitar la generalización.CONCLUSIONES:Las fugas del extremo de la bolsa en J tienen presentaciones clínicas variables y requieren un alto índice de sospecha. La cirugía de rescate de la bolsa se requiere en la mayoría y se asocia con una alta tasa de rescate de la bolsa. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C50 . (Traducción- Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

Best surgical approach for splenic flexure colon cancers: Extended versus segmental resection?

BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical treatment approach for splenic flexure colon cancers remains controversial regarding the type of resection. METHODS: We hypothesized that both extended and segmental resections have similar surgical and oncologic outcomes. A retrospective review of prospectively collected database was performed on all patients who had colectomy for splenic flexure colon cancer between 1996 and 2018. RESULTS: Of 142 patients, 119 underwent extended resection; therefore, this group was compared with the group which underwent segmental resection (n = 23). The groups were similar in age, sex, ASA scores, operative times, estimated blood loss, hospital length of stay, and postoperative complication rates (p > 0.05). Median follow-up was 9.58 years (IQR:5.46-16.48). Multivariable regression models demonstrated no significant association between resection approach and disease-free survival (HR 1.63 [95%CI:0.91-2.92]), as well as overall survival (HR 1.80 [95%CI:0.97; 3.36]). CONCLUSION: In the treatment of splenic flexure colon cancer, segmental colon resections have similar oncologic outcomes when compared to extended colectomies.

The impact of race and socioeconomic status on stage IV colorectal cancer survival.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to determine the impact of race and socioeconomics on survival in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer. METHODS: A prospective database of stage IV colorectal cancer patients treated at a multi-hospital health system from 2015 to 2019 was retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate survival analysis using log-rank Mantel-Cox test and Cox proportional hazard model were performed to determine the impact of race, socioeconomic factors, presentation, and treatment on overall survival. RESULTS: 4012 patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer, of which 803 patients were stage IV. There were 677 (84.3%) White, and 108 (13.4%) Black patients. Black patients have worse 5-year overall survival than white patients (HR 1.43 (1.09-1.87)). Patients who received chemotherapy had significantly better survival than patients who did not receive chemotherapy (HR 0.58 (0.47-0.71)). Black patients have significantly lower rates of receiving chemotherapy as compared to white patients (61.1% vs 75.37%, p = 0.0018). CONCLUSION: Patients with Stage IV colorectal cancer have worse survival if they are black, older age, and did not receive chemotherapy.

Effect of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Surgical Site Infections in High-Risk Reoperative Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal resections have relatively high rates of surgical site infections causing significant morbidity. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy was introduced to improve wound healing of closed surgical incisions and to prevent surgical site infections. OBJECTIVE: This randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate the effect of incisional NPWT on superficial surgical site infections in high-risk, open, reoperative colorectal surgery. DESIGN: This was a single-center randomized controlled trial conducted between July 2015-October 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to incisional negative pressure wound therapy or standard gauze dressing with a 1:1 ratio. A total of 298 patients were included. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at the colorectal surgery department of a tertiary-level hospital. PATIENTS: This study included patients older than 18 years who underwent elective reoperative open colorectal resections. Patients were excluded who had open surgery within the past 3 months, who had active surgical site infection, and who underwent laparoscopic procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was superficial surgical site infection within 30 days. Secondary outcomes were deep and organ-space surgical site infections within 7 days and 30 days, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients were included in each arm. The mean age was 51 years, and 49.5% were women. Demographics, preoperative comorbidities, and preoperative albumin levels were comparable between the groups. Overall, most surgeries were performed for IBD, and 77% of the patients had an ostomy fashioned during the surgery. No significant difference was found between the groups in 30-day superficial surgical site infection rate (14.1% in control versus 9.4% in incisional negative pressure wound therapy; p = 0.28). Deep and organ-space surgical site infections rates at 7 and 30 days were also comparable between the groups. Postoperative length of stay and complication rates (Clavien-Dindo grade) were also comparable between the groups. LIMITATIONS: The patient population included in the trial consisted of a selected group of high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: Incisional negative pressure wound therapy was not associated with reduced superficial surgical site infection or overall complication rates in patients undergoing high-risk reoperative colorectal resections. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B956 . EFECTO DE LA TERAPIA DE HERIDA INSICIONAL CON PRESIN NEGATIVA EN INFECCIONES DEL SITIO QUIRRGICO EN CIRUGA COLORRECTAL REOPERATORIA DE ALTO RIESGO UN ENSAYO CONTROLADO ALEATORIZADO: ANTECEDENTES:Las resecciones colorrectales tienen tasas relativamente altas de infecciones del sitio quirúrgico que causan una morbilidad significativa. La terapia de heridas incisionales con presión negativa se introdujo para mejorar la cicatrización de las heridas de incisiones quirúrgicas cerradas y para prevenir infecciones del sitio quirúrgico.OBJETIVO:El objetivo de este ensayo controlado y aleatorizado fue investigar el efecto de la terapia de herida incisional con presión negativa en infecciones superficiales del sitio quirúrgico en cirugía colorrectal re operatoria, abierta y de alto riesgo.DISEÑO:Ensayo controlado y aleatorizado de un solo centro entre julio de 2015 y octubre de 2020. Los pacientes fueron aleatorizados para recibir tratamiento para heridas incisionales con presión negativa o vendaje de gasa estándar en una proporción de 1:1. Se incluyeron un total de 298 pacientes.AJUSTE:Este estudio se realizó en el departamento de cirugía colorrectal de un hospital de tercer nivel.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes mayores de 18 años que se fueron sometidos a resecciones colorrectales abiertas, re operatorias y electivas. Se excluyeron aquellos pacientes que tuvieron cirugía abierta en los últimos 3 meses, con infección activa del sitio quirúrgico y que fueron sometidos a procedimientos laparoscópicos.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue infección superficial del sitio quirúrgico dentro de los 30 días. Los resultados secundarios fueron infecciones del sitio quirúrgico profundas y del espacio orgánico dentro de los 7 y 30 días, las complicaciones posoperatorias y la duración de la estancia hospitalaria.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 149 pacientes en cada brazo. La edad media fue de 51 años y el 49,5% fueron mujeres. La demografía, las comorbilidades preoperatorias y los niveles de albúmina preoperatoria fueron comparables entre los grupos. En general, la mayoría de las cirugías fueron realizadas por enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal y al 77 % de los pacientes se les confecciono una ostomía durante la cirugía. No hubo diferencias significativas entre los grupos en la tasa de infección del sitio quirúrgico superficial a los 30 días (14,1 % en el control frente a 9,4 % en el tratamiento de herida incisional con presión negativa, p = 0,28). Las tasas de infecciones del sitio quirúrgico profundas y del espacio orgánico a los 7 y 30 días también fueron comparables entre los grupos. La duración de la estancia postoperatoria y las tasas de complicaciones (Clavien-Dindo Graduacion) también fueron comparables entre los grupos.LIMITACIONES:La población de pacientes incluida en el ensayo consistió en un grupo seleccionado de pacientes de alto riesgo.CONCLUSIONES:Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B956 . (Traducción-Dr. Osvaldo Gauto ).

Surgical Dilemmas Associated with Malignant Large Bowel Obstructions.

Despite an increase in screening colonoscopy, with the objective to decrease the incidence of colorectal cancer, a third of patients will present with an obstructing cancer. Malignant large bowel obstructions (MLBO) pose a challenging workup and treatment paradigm where an oncologic primary tumor resection must be balanced with relieving the obstruction, functional outcomes, palliation, and consideration for adjuvant therapy. A thorough work up with cross-sectional imaging and medical optimization should be attempted; however, patients may present in extremis and require emergent intervention. The onset of MLBO can be insidious, but result in electrolyte derangements, perforation, small bowel obstruction, hemorrhage, and ischemia. Self-expandable metallic stents have been used as palliation or as a bridge to surgery and have allowed for minimally invasive surgical options as well as a decrease in stoma rates. Patients with signs of colon ischemia or perforation require emergent surgery, which is associated with an increase in stoma formation, morbidity, mortality, and a decrease in overall survival.

Stop the Smudge: A Novel Solution to Loss of Vision During Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: An obscured vision of surgical field during laparoscopic surgery is inconvenient. Several temporary methods were described as solutions to loss of vision, and common practice is scope removal, cleaning, and heating. A lately developed and introduced device claims continuous clear vision during laparoscopic surgery. This study aims to present our initial experience with the device during laparoscopic colorectal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have included medical records of all patients scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal surgery with the device between March and August 2021 at Cleveland Clinic. Patient demographics, surgery type and time, the number of loss of vision events were recorded. RESULTS: Fifteen patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery during the study period. The median age was 42 (range: 25 to 86) years, and 10 (66%) were female. The median surgery time was 127 (range: 67 to 240) minutes, and the median loss of vision event number was 3 (1 to 6) per surgery. There was no need for laparoscope removal during any of the surgeries. All surgeries were completed without any intraoperative complications. CONCLUSION: The novel system, provides clear vision during laparoscopic colorectal surgery with no need of scope removal for loss of vision events. The system provides removal of particulate gathering on the tip of the scope.

Turnbull-Cutait abdominoperineal pull-through operation: The Cleveland Clinic experience in the 21st century.

AIM: The Turnbull-Cutait pull-through procedure (TCO) restores intestinal continuity in the setting of chronic pelvic sepsis, colorectal anastomotic leak, complex pelvic fistulas and technical challenges related to complicated rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the TCO for salvaging complex pelvic conditions and to compare it to hand-sewn immediate coloanal anastomosis (CAA). METHODS: This is a retrospective single-institution study where we searched a prospectively maintained database to identify patients who underwent the TCO. Patient demographics, operative indications and outcomes were analysed. TCO success was defined as maintenance of intestinal continuity and being stoma-free. Kaplan-Meier analysis was employed for stoma-free survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients with TCO and 129 patients with CAA were included. The TCO success rate was 69% at a median of 1.4 years' follow-up with 25 (31%) patients ending up with a permanent stoma compared to 22 (17%) in the CAA group with a median follow-up of 4 years (P = 0.03). The Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence of TCO success at 1, 3 and 5 years was 79%, 60% and 51%, respectively, compared to 91%, 81% and 73% after CAA. CONCLUSION: The TCO has a high success rate for patients with complex pelvic conditions who may be facing a permanent stoma as their only option.

Right colon, left colon, and rectal cancer have different oncologic and quality of life outcomes.

PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer patients are commonly considered a single entity in outcomes studies. This is particularly true for quality of life (QOL) studies. This study aims to compare oncologic and QOL outcomes between right colon, left colon, and rectal cancer in patients operated on in a single high-volume institution. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was queried to identify patients with pathological stages I-III colorectal adenocarcinoma electively operated on with curative intent between 2000 and 2010. Patient characteristics, perioperative and oncologic outcomes, and QOL were compared according to cancer location. RESULTS: Two-thousand sixty-five (606 right colon cancer [RCC], 366 left colon cancer [LCC], and 1093 rectal cancer [RC]) patients met the inclusion criteria. LCC had better overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in the non-adjusted analysis (p < 0.001) and better OS in multivariate analysis adjusted by age, gender, ASA, chemotherapy, and pathological stage (p = 0.024). Although RCC had worse OS and DFS in non-adjusted survival analysis than LCC and RC, when adjusted for the factors above, RCC had better survival outcomes than RC, but not LCC. COX regression analysis showed age (p < 0.001), gender (p = 0.016), ASA (p < 0.001), pathological stage (p < 0.001), adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.043), and cancer location (p = 0.024) were independently associated with OS. Age (p < 0.001), gender (p = 0.030), ASA (p = 0.004), and pathological stage (p < 0.001) were independently associated with DFS. Patients with RC reported more sexual dysfunction and work restrictions than colon cancers (p = 0.015 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: In an adjusted multivariate analysis, colon cancers demonstrated better survival outcomes when compared to rectal cancers.